About Me

Sunday, December 30, 2012

HOW I WAS LIKE THE MAN WITH THE WOODEN EYE: MY STORY ABOUT READING THE BIBLE DEVOTIONALY



I don’t know where I first heard the phrase “quiet time.”  I knew what it was before my family became involved in a church.  I know this because the first time I tried to have a “quiet time” was to impress a pastor at summer camp.  I waited until he left the cabin to go to the shower-house, then I went out on the cabin porch with a Bible my parents had given me.  When I saw him walking back, I opened up my Bible and began staring at the page trying to look as holy as possible.  The whole thing sort of backfired when the pastor asked me what I was reading.  I read the heading over that paragraph and repeated it to him.

Have you ever seen the second Pirates of the Caribbean movie?  At the beginning of the movie the guy with the wooden eyeball is on a rowboat “reading” a bible.  His friend begins to tease him about doing this.  The ensuing conversation about Divine providence comes to a humorous end when the guy with the Bible’s friend points out that he can’t even read.  The man with the wooden eyeball is ready, however, as he says, “It’s the Bible, you get points for trying!” 

The man and the wooden eyeball and my 11 year old self had the exact understanding of devotional reading of the Bible.  It was the thought that counted, just holding the bible in your hands, reading the words—regardless of whether or not you understood them—this added some strange and commendable holiness to your life.  This continued to be my view of reading the Bible devotionally for years to come.  It was not until I was a freshman in college that my view on how Scripture should impact my life on a daily basis changed. 

Understand, by the time I was a freshman in college, I had preached several sermons, had been a leader in my youth group, and was considered by my peers to be knowledgeable about the Bible.  Despite all these things, however, I had never kept a consistent devotional time.  I had tried.  I had purchased devotionals, Bibles, journals, and I had tried to use these things, but the result was always the same, after a few days of making myself spend time reading Scripture, I stopped. It would make for a great story if I said I stopped reading the Bible each time I tried to read it devotionally because twelve demons ganged up on me, wrenched my Bible from my hand, and threatened me to never touch it again.  But that’s not what happened.  I didn’t read my Bible daily because . . . I didn’t want to. 

In college God blessed me with some friends who were making God’s word a part of their daily lives. I was blessed to live with a guy named Pete my sophomore year, and I saw Pete reading his Bible a lot. I am not saying this guy was reading the Bible ten hours a day or anything, but I could tell when Pete encountered Scripture, it was because he wanted to.  Being around people like Pete showed me that spending time in the Word of God was not about showing other people you are so holy that you get up every morning and wade through all the genealogies in Chronicles, instead, reading the Bible daily is about satisfying a hunger, a thirst, a deep desire for God’s presence in your life.

This realization sparked a journey for me, one that I am still on.  I would love to say that my sophmore year of college I have felt such an insatiable hunger for God’s Word that I have not missed spending time in it a single day since, but this is not the case.  The truth is that God used that time in my life to begin leading down a path where God’s Word became more and more a part of my daily life.  It has been like learning to appreciate good food or fine art, the more I have experienced God’s Word, the more I have wanted it, craved it, needed it. 

It is my prayer that God has already kindled in you a hunger for his Word.  I pray that it is a part of your daily life.  But if it is not, or if it is and you are looking for encouragement, I want to provide some assistance in getting you started.  To do this, I am posting two articles on this blog.  One focuses on why to spend daily time in God’s Word.  In this article I have tried to share with you some of the things God planted in my heart to cause me to crave his Word.  The second article is on how to spend daily time in God’s Word and discusses some basic methods and tools which have helped me in my journey.

I was once like the man with the wooden eye.  I thought that the reading the Bible earned me some kind of “holy points.”  But no such points exist.  Spending time in God’s Word is not about what we earn, it is about what sustains us.  It is not about what we should do, it is about what we desire to do.  It is not about cold piety, but consuming passion.  It should not be admirable, it should be addicting.  I pray you become addicted as well my friends, for what kind of transformation would come from those addicted to the Word of God?

Monday, November 5, 2012

A Brief Essay on the Recent Discovery of "The Gospel of Jesus' Wife"


Recently, social media and news sites have been “buzzing” concerning the recent publication of an ancient papyri (really old paper made from the Egyptian Papyrus plant) fragment which contains a section of narrative in which Jesus says, “My wife. . .” When I first read these articles, I became far more excited than I should have been, but please understand, it is very rare that my field of study comes this close to popular culture.  This evening I have been able to read the paper published on the fragment, written by Dr. Karen King of Harvard who was asked to study the fragment by its owner, and would like to give my response to the social media world.  I have two purposes in doing this.   First, I am a lover of history, and this find gives us insight into a fascinating period in the history of our world. Second, and more importantly, I am a Christian who believes that what the New Testament says about Jesus is the most central truth to my life and is the greatest message ever conveyed to humanity.  I am also a Christian who has been blessed to spend the past six years studying the biblical text at the academic level and have done so in hopes that my research and knowledge would be beneficial to others.  After reading Dr. King’s paper, I would submit that this find, while historically fascinating, presents no threat to the historical accuracy of the Jesus depicted in the four Gospels of the Christian New Testament.

A REQUEST OF READERS

Before I begin some qualifiers:   1) To my Christian friends, this will be a discussion drawing upon academic data, not religious experience.  I do, of course, believe in the inspiration of the New Testament by the Holy Spirit, but I recognize that not everyone who will read this essay, and certainly not everyone who will read Dr. King’s paper will approach the New Testament in such a way.  Therefore, I will attempt to briefly and simply respond to this paper based on historical evidence, after all, is there any reason that the inspiration of the New Testament would make it stand in contradiction to sound, historical data?  To my non-believing or skeptical friends, please do not take my central point—that the recent papyri fragment does not present a significant challenge to the historical accuracy of the New Testament—as blind religious dogma.  Read with an open mind.

THE PAPYRUS FRAGMENT
The papyrus fragment itself was presented to Dr. King by a private owner.  Dr. King reports it to be part of a collection which contains, among other fragments, a fragment of the Gospel of John in Coptic.  The fragment is written in Coptic which was the language of Northern Egypt written in the Greek alphabet using a few additional letters.  Coptic was used colloquially from the 2nd-17th century A.D. and is currently used for the liturgy of the Coptic Church.  King dates the fragment as being from the 4th century (300-400 AD).  Her dating is based upon paleography—that is the study of the handwriting found on the fragment. 
The fragment measures 4cm tall by 8cm wide (1.5x3inches).  The size of the fragment should not cause one to question its historical significance, however.  P52 (papyrus 52) which contains the earliest witness to the New Testament is only slightly larger (3.5x2.5inches).  The fragment contains writing on both sides which indicates that it is likely a piece of a codex (book) as opposed to a scroll.  Little is known concerning the origin of the fragment.  King rightly observes that given the condition of the scroll and the fact that it is in readable condition, Egypt is a likely place for composition.  (Papyri fragments are most commonly found in Egypt because its dry climate helps preserve the papyri)
CONTENT
                Due to the fact that Dr. King’s work is yet to be published and, therefore, cannot be properly cited, I will not give the transcription of the fragment here.  If you are interested, a link to the draft copy of Dr. Kings paper which is pending publication in the Harvard Theological Review will be posted with this essay.  The transcription of the fragment can be found in the article.  What is of note—and what has drawn media attention—is the fact that the fragment contains a line which reads, “Jesus said to them, ‘my wife. . .’”  A Woman named Mary is mentioned in the preceding line and, based on similarities to the Gospel of Mary Magdalene(a Gnostic gospel from the same time period) Mary Magdalene is probably the Mary being spoken of.  The surrounding material is insufficient in length to place this context in any sort of direct context, but King suggests that this line and the eight which accompany it would be parallel to the discipleship and family material found in the Gnostic Gospels, such as the Gospel of Thomas.*  Because of the reference to Jesus’ wife, King is referring to the fragment as The Gospel of Jesus Wife.  It should be understood that the title was given only for the sake of clarity (and no doubt appeal to the media) and not a reference to Jesus’ wife as the actual author of the work a fact which King states from the outset of her work.    
AUTHENTICITY
It is difficult to give any critical analysis concerning the authenticity of the fragment.  Dr. King chronicles in her paper the process of verifying the manuscript as being one of initially mixed reaction among scholars in the field of Coptic studies.  King and her research team ultimately conclude that the fragment appears to be authentic and have the support of several prominent scholars.  For the purpose of this review, Dr. King’s conclusions will be accepted.  Much of the evidence she gives seems consistent with a work composed in the 4th century.  Readers should note that any issues with authenticity will now have the chance to be worked out in the broader field of scholarship in coming years.  Any issues with authenticity will be duly addressed given time.
IMPLICATIONS
The implications of this manuscript are not as earth shattering as some might be led to believe based on some recent reports in the media.  King says in both the introduction and conclusion of her paper that the fragment in question is not sufficient evidence to prove that Jesus was married.  The reason that this find gives little evidence for constructing a historical portrait of Jesus is that it is written far too late to provide the same degree of historical reliability as the four Gospels of the New Testament.  (Of these John is the latest, being written 80-120 AD)** King bluntly acknowledges this fact in her conclusion.  What this fragment does show is the broad differences in the portrayal of Jesus in the early Christian community.  The papyri fragment published by King does show that there were a group of ancient Christians who were teaching that Jesus had been married.  King suggests in her paper that such teachings likely arose in a reaction against early church leaders advocating celibacy and using the celibacy of Christ as evidence in their arguments.
CONCLUSIONS
While the papyri fragment under examination by Dr. King gives fascinating insight into the early church, it does not give any significant insight into the life of Christ as it was written more than 100 years (at the earliest) after the four canonical gospels.  The fragment is likely a piece of literature which attempted to do what Christians have (wrongly) been doing for two millennia and continue to do today—make Jesus say what they wish him to say.  The phenomena continues into the present day, though rarely through the composition of pseudo-gospels.  Rather, the modern church continues to follow down the path of this ancient, Coptic text by reading false meaning into the canonical text rather than composing new gospels of their own.  Read the “Gospel of Jesus Wife” for what it is, fascinating history and an insight into a present fallacy, not a reason to doubt the historical reliability of the Jesus of the New Testament.

*The Gospel of Thomas is one of several so called Gnostic Gospels written late in the second century. 
**The date for John was once thought to be as late as that of the Gnostic Gospels, but the above mentioned P52 has ruled out such a possibility.    

Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Citizens or Slaves? A Sermon on Philippians 2:1-11


CITIZENS OR SLAVES?

INTRODUCTION

To understand Paul’s letter to the Philippians, it is helpful to first know a little about the city of Philippi and the church which was located there.  Philippi is referred to in Acts 16:12 as a “leading city of Macedonia (modern day Greece).  The city was located along the main road which connected Rome to the Mediterranean so there was a rich economic trade within the city.  Added to this was the fact that 8 miles south of the city was the port of Neapolis (which Paul sails to in Acts 16:11) which provided additional trade. 

Philippi had been conquered by the Romans and settled by Roman army veterans.  Because of this, the city enjoyed a special status within the Roman Empire.  Most importantly, all freed people born within Philippi were given the status of Roman citizens.  This meant, among many things, that they had a right to trial and were exempt from certain punishments such as crucifixion.  The residents of Philippi also enjoyed an immense tax cut from the Roman government.  Most people in the Roman empire paid 50-70% of their monetary income to taxes, Philippians were nearly tax exempt.  All this to say, if the Philippians were around today, they would be called the 1%.  We must keep in mind as we read Philippians that they were privileged people, born with rights above and beyond those of normal people in the first century.  For this reason, it should be very easy for us to identify with the people of Philippi, for, after all, we Americans are privileged people born with rights above and beyond those of most people in the 21st century.  That is not a bad thing, but it is our context.

Paul was immensely close with the church at Philippi.  We can see this  in the success of his ministry there in Acts 16 and even more so in his letter to the Philippians.  It is evident that they were using their material blessings for kingdom work by supporting Paul.  Paul does not express the frustration with the church in Philippi as he does with other churches(consider Gal 3:1).  Paul’s purpose is to encourage and exhort more than to correct or rebuke.  Of all Paul’s letters, Philippians is the most like the kind of letter you or I might write.  It is personal, covers several topics, and expresses deep love and affection.

As we pick up our text this morning, Paul has spent his first chapter informing the Philippians of his current state, which is in prison.  Paul speaks to the church of Philippi of his longing to be with Christ and his passion for ministry, ultimately concluding that for him, “to live is Christ and to die is gain.”  Paul then transitions in 1:27 to speaking of the Philippian church itself.  He says in vv. 29-30 “For it has been granted to you that for the sake of Christ you should not only believe in him but also suffer for his sake, engaged in the same conflict that you saw I had and now hear that I still have.”   After saying this, Paul enters into the text we will be examining this morning. 

BODY
A. COMFORT IN CHRIST, NOT ROME (2:1)

It may seem odd to us that Paul begins this section after speaking of the coming suffering of the church.  If I were to stand here this morning and warn you, privileged citizens just like the Philippians, that you would soon be suffering like Jesus, your world would be turned upside down.  So why does Paul begin to speak of suffering at the close of chapter one and begin to discuss encouragement and community and love in verse one of chapter two?  I found this very confusing, and over the past two weeks as I prepared for this message, I read the text over and over trying to understand why Paul sets it up like this.  This is what I believe; I believe Paul begins chapter two in this way because he knew the Philippians world was turned upside down because of this promise of coming suffering.  Rome, the superpower in which the Philippians had long sought comfort would soon begin to persecute the Christians in their city.  Because of this, Paul begins teaching that their encouragement, comfort, community, and affection must now come from being identified in Christ, and not from their citizenship.  Therefore, the first point I wish us to draw out of this text is that we must find comfort in Christ, not Rome.  Understand, we can put in the place of Rome anything we draw comfort from.  Comfort in Christ not Money, comfort in Christ, not friends, etc.

So, Paul begins this section challenging the Philippians to abandon their status as citizens and find all value in Christ.  No encouragement in Rome, but in Christ!  No comfort from financial security, but in love!  No true fellowship in the markets and public places of Philippi, but in the Spirit!  Here in verse one, Paul clearly states the reaction every Christian must face if he or she suffers for Christ, they will be comforted by Christ as well.  Consider II Corithians 1:5, “For we share abundantly in Christ’s sufferings, so through Christ we share abundantly in comfort too.” 

This method of thinking runs directly opposite from what we so often strive to achieve in as Christians.   More often than not, our daily decisions, even those which concern our faith, are made in ways which show we seek our comfort in earthly things, not in Christ.  We seek comfort in our privileged citizenship, whether as citizens of our country, our churches, our economic brackets, etc.  Understand, I am not trying to make us feel guilty to be Americans, I a merely trying to challenge us based upon Phil 2:1 that finding value in Christ is so much better.

In Kayla and mine’s family, we have recently found the truth that finding contentment in Christ is far sweeter than finding it in any earthly citizenship.  Kayla’s parents and her brother Joshua came to visit us over Christmas break.  The entire visit, Joshua was experiencing terrible pain from swelling in his shoulder.  As soon as they got back, tests were run and we received word that Josh had leukemia.  The doctors told us that Joshua’s chances of survival were excellent, but he would suffer immensely for the next two years.  Instantly, wealth, status, citizenship did not matter.  We visited Josh a month and a half ago, he looked terrible.  Here is a kid in the prime of his life—a good kid—who is losing his hair, his skin broken out from medication, his childhood put on hold because of cancer.  And yet, Josh has not lost encouragement, comfort, community, affection, or sympathy.  For Joshua, these things are found in Christ and cancer cannot touch them.  

This is the promise of the Christian life.  Suffering. . . often.  The more I am encountered with life and with Scripture, the more I am convinced suffering will be the norm for Christians.  So where is our comfort?  In Christ.  Encouragement, comfort, community, affection, these things are untouchable to any outward force if we find such things in Christ.  Our rights and status as healthy people, as citizens of churches, social classes, yes, even our rights as citizens of our country may be taken away, but all comfort will still be found in Christ. 

Now this is a lot about this one verse, but I think it is essential to understand before we move on.  Verse one begins with and “if” and I think the best translation of v. 2 should begin with a “then” (it does in the NIV).  What Paul is saying in verses 2-4 flow directly out of what he has said in v. 1.  If we are living with all comfort found in Christ, not in any earthly citizenship, then we will live in the manner described in verses 2-4 and illustrated in verses 5-11.

B. FOCUS ON OTHERS NOT SELF (2:2-4) 

Paul jumps from speaking of where we place comfort to radically challenging us how we live out our lives in which comfort is placed in Christ.  Before we start this, let me speak for just a moment of secular theories concerning what motivates people. If we accept the most popular theory for what motivates people—that one found within secular psychiatry—then we would be led to believe that all human emotions are driven by some preservation of self.  This theory is not some radical thing known only to hardened atheists, this is what our high school students will be taught when they take psychology.  It is upon this theory that most educational programs are currently run, and it is a theory that has slowly crept its way into the church.

I believe this is why we are currently in a church culture which encourages, above all things, the comfort of its members.  The most comfortable pews, the most comfortable style of preaching and teaching, the worship style the congregation is most comfortable with, all because we have accidentally bought into the theory that everything is motivated by what makes us happy as individuals.  Let’s see how this matches up with Paul’s admonition to the Philippians in verses 2-4: after saying all value is found in Christ (v.1) Paul states,

2[Then], complete my joy by being of the same mind, having the same love, being in full accord and of one mind. 3Do nothing from rivalry or conceit, but in humility count others more significant than yourselves. 4Let each of you look not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others.”  Paul clearly argues against the way of thinking we just discussed.  Paul continues his thought from v.1 (Comfort in Christ not Rome) saying that if our comfort is in Christ, then our focus will be on others, not on ourselves.

Paul begins making this point in verse 2, encouraging believers to be of the same mind, have the same love, to be of full accord, and to have one mind.  This passage can be mistaken as a command that all Christians, or at least all Christians within individual church bodies must “think the same way” that is to have identical thoughts and beliefs, yet that is not Paul’s point here.  What is translated here in the ESV as “being of one mind” is captured more fully in the NIV as “being of one purpose.”  The Greek literally emphasizes thinking about one thing.  Based on verse one, it is clear to see that the “one thing” we should be thinking of or focusing on is Christ.  So what Paul is advocating here is not cult-like conformity, but Christ like focus, transferring our focus off ourselves and onto Christ. 

I am afraid that Christ-like focus is lacking dearly in our churches.  Is it right that we have built an empire in American Christianity—complete with great buildings, complex leadership systems, and marketing strategies—and yet we have in many ways failed in feeding the poor which Jesus commanded in Matthew 25, and bringing the gospel to all nations which he commanded in Matthew 28?  We have failed to focus on the things of Christ, and have instead wandered off focusing on things that, ultimately, pleased us.  So how do we please Christ?  Where does he desire our focus to be?  Consider verses 3-4:

The Holy Spirit working through Paul first makes it clear that nothing done out of selfishness is focused upon Christ, rather those things which are done in humility.  I am ashamed to admit to you that when I read the command, “do nothing out of rivalry or conceit” (and I think the King James has this rendered more correctly when it says vainglory.  The word comes from the idea of “empty glory” referring to that glory that a person heaps upon themselves) I am stung, because so often my actions are so motivated. 

Pride has been the sin which I have found myself most prone to.  The beginning of verse 3 makes it clear that nothing done out of Pride is done from a soul which is focused upon Christ.  The command here is that instead of acting in pride we are to act in humility.  Paul defines humility for us as “counting others more significant than yourselves.”  The point here is not to count people more valuable than we are, but to count them as more worthy of your time and attention than yourself. 

Paul completes this thought in verse 4 saying “Let each of you look not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others.”  This is what it means to truly be focused on the things of Christ, to humbly look to others needs before our own. The tension here is on “each” and “others.”  If we are to be a church focused on Christ, then it must be obvious that in obedience to him we are focused on others needs, not our own.  I will guarantee you that no one is more acutely aware of your churches focus on yourselves or on others than the visitors who encounter you throughout the week, not only in your services (it is moderately easy to be focused on others in a church service) but throughout the week.  How do you deal with people outside these four walls?  Do you realize that the way you deal with people out there is an indicator to those in your community where the focus of your church is? 

Now understand, what Scripture calls for here is not easy to put into practice.  This is not a command for everyone to hold hands and sing “Why can’t we all just get along?”  This is a biblical mandate for me to put aside what I want and look to your good instead.  For you to put aside what you want and look to my good instead.  For both of us to do this because we are focused on Christ, and not ourselves. This is incredibly difficult for us to do.

 I do not agree with modern psychology that all actions should be motivated by concern for ourselves, but I do believe that is our default.  Sinful nature has brought us to this point, even original sin comes from a desire to do what is good for us and not a desire to do what is good for others.  When Eve eats from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil Satan helps her corrupt her desires from pleasing God and Adam to pleasing herself.  We have all likewise been caught up in this same trap.  Sin sets our default to think of Self first, only the spirit of God at work in us can reset it to think of Others first.

I cannot think of this principle—putting others first—without thinking of my Grandma, especially in the recent weeks.  My Grandpa passed away at the beginning of this month.  He and I were extremely close, but we thought very differently.  Though he loved my Grandma dearly, and taught me much about romance and married love—every time I give Kayla flowers, I am following in my Grandpa’s footsteps—he often seemed selfish in his relationship with my Grandma.  I want to make it very clear that my Grandpa was not cruel, he never once physically hurt Grandma, and ultimately, she was the most important human person in his life.  But when there was a difference of opinion between the two of them, he had no concept of how to concede to her opinion. 

When these points of disagreement arose, Grandpa often took a stance of almost comic stubbornness.  I remember many times when Grandma would be trying to fix things—she is excellent at fixing things—and Grandpa would interfere and insist that she do things a different way.  Now understand, my Grandma has a knack for deductive reasoning.  If there is a problem with a piece of machinery or hardware, she can typically fix it.  My Grandpa was well read, an exceptional speaker, and the best dairyman in Meriwether county, but his technical capabilities began and ended with milking a cow.  These disagreements always ended in the same fashion, my Grandma would argue for a short period, sigh, and try things Grandpa’s way. 

I was once asked what love sounded like.  After much thought, I replied, “it sounds like my Grandma’s sigh.”  Grandma’s love for my Grandpa manifested itself in the exact humility that we are to show to one another. When disagreements occur, our default should not be to insist that we get things our way, rather, we should default to looking first to the good of others.

I want to clarify two things about this illustration.  First, my Grandma did not owe my Grandpa this humble submission.  This is not the kind of submission the Bible speaks of between husband and wife.  She had the right to win those arguments, but she lovingly, humbly, gave up those rights for my Grandpa.  Secondly, I do not wish to suggest that Christians should be spineless.  I am speaking here only of those disagreements which involve our personal interests.  There are points at which we must take a firm stand and defend truth.  If someone disagrees with us on biblical issues, then we have a mandate to lovingly stand firm in truth.

Let us not miss the magnitude of Paul’s command to consider others needs more important than our own.  If we do this, we will often find ourselves in the same situation as my Grandma.  We will be wronged, we will be hurt, we will often not get our way.  This sounds terribly difficult.  Perhaps your reaction this morning might be, “I will ignore this teaching.”  After all, these are only four verses.  But understand the deep rooted teaching of this principle in Scripture. 

This is the teaching of Mark 12:31, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”

It is Paul’s point in I Corinthians 10:33, “Just as I try to please everyone in everything I do, not seeking my advantage, but that of many that they might be saved.”

It is the essence of Romans 15:2, “Let each of us please his neighbor for his good to build him up.”

It is the command of I Corinthians 10:24, “Let no one seek his own good but the good of his neighbor.”

It is the living out of Galatians 6:2, “Bear one another’s burdens and so fulfill the law of Christ.”

Paul, in his writings, comes to this principle, putting others ahead of yourself, giving up your rights for theirs time and time again.  It should communicate to us with particular power here in Philippians, as these are a group of people like us, people with immense rights of citizenship, and the Spirit’s message to them through Paul is clear, Give up your rights!  Put others before yourself!  Reject the worldly system which says, “Me first!” and embrace this principle which says “Others first!”

 Why is this such a big deal to Paul?  Because he finds the core of the teaching in the gospel itself.  We are going to look at these next 7 verses—some of the most well known in the Bible—the way Paul uses them here in Philippians, as the illustration and foundation for counting others more significant than ourselves.  We know Philippians 2:6-11was a hymn of the early church.  When it is preached upon, it is typically a message concerning who Jesus’ was and the nature of his incarnation, and many fine sermons are preached from this text concerning Jesus’ incarnation.  Paul’s use of the hymn here in chapter 2 is to give the ultimate foundation and illustration for Christians surrendering their rights for the sake of others.  As we briefly examine Paul’s use of this hymn, I believe we will find one of the greatest challenges of the Christian life.  Quickly, let’s look at verses 5-8 and then I will make two observations concerning 9-11 and we will be done.

BE SLAVES, SURRENDER CITIZENSHIP

To understand how Paul is using this ancient hymn, we must understand v. 5.  English translations typically use the word “attitude” or “mind” in verse five.  The Greek here is a command saying literally, “think this way about yourself.”  This is the type of thinking that is being referred to in 2:5 that type of thinking which concerns ourselves.  That is why attitude is used in some translation (NIV) because after all, our attitude is what we think concerning ourselves.  The point of verse five is literally “Think this way about yourself which Christ Jesus also thought about himself.”  When Paul says think this way he is referring to his description of considering others needs more important than our own.  He goes on to say that this putting others first was the way Christ thought concerning himself.  So Paul makes Christ the example and defense for his position of putting others first.  This is why selfless living was such a big deal to Paul, he rightly understood it as being rooted in the gospel, in the very life of Christ.  So, understanding the hymn that follows as an example of Jesus’ selfless living, let’s examine verses 6-8.  In these verses, Paul gives us the ultimate examples of how verse 1-4 are to be applied.  I see three basic actions of Jesus which Paul emphasizes.

First, Paul points out that though Jesus existed in “nature” or “form” as God (that is, he was God) he did not grasp this status.  This has confused me for years.  When I first preached this text 12 years ago, I skipped over this part because I had no clue what it meant.  This is where Greek is very helpful.  The word we translate as “grasp” (ESV, NIV) comes from a word that means “to hold onto for your own benefit.”  This is why the KJV says uses the phrase “he thought it not robbery with God.”  The point here is that Jesus did not selfishly hold on to his nature as God.  Understand, this does not mean that Jesus ever stopped being God, it means that he did not selfishly grasp hold of his divinity.  If we are to understand Jesus’ radical sacrifice for others, we must first get Paul’s point that he was God, but did not use his “Godness” for his benefit but for ours.

Second, we see that Jesus “made himself nothing.” (ESV)  The NASB is closer to the Greek here when it says he “emptied himself.”  The picture Paul is painting is that Jesus, being God, pours himself out for the sake of humanity. Not that he empties himself of being God, but that he empties himself of himself to serve others.  How does he do this?  In the most radical way possible.  Look back at verse 6 for a moment.  There we saw that Jesus existed in the nature or form of God.  Now come back down to verse 7.  What form does he take when he pours himself out?  The form of a servant.  Could there be a more radical contrast!?  Jesus who is God pours himself out and becomes our servant?  The word which is translated in the ESV, NIV, and KJV as servant is more accurately as slave or bond-servant as in the NASB.  A good definition of the word used here is “a person without advantages, with no rights or privileges, but in servanthood to all.”[1]    What more powerful illustration could we ask for?  Here is a being with rights that far exceed the citizenship of Rome, or of America, far exceeds the privileges of being residents of Philippi or Belle Chasse, rather he has all the rights and privileges of God!  And yet he becomes a slave.  This hymn goes on to remind us that Jesus does what all good slaves must do:

Thirdly, he humbles himself to the point of death, that is the death of the cross.  Here Paul does as he so frequently does throughout his letter, he points churches to the cross. Much has been said of the lack of the cross in contemporary Christian preaching and teaching, but often when we do speak of the cross we miss the point.  Yes, there is a sense of glory about the cross for all who believe, but only this side of the resurrection.  This hymn views the cross from the perspective of the Philippians.  They knew crucifixion.  They would have seen people crucified, known of the blood and the gore and the pain, but every time a Philippian passed a cross they had the knowledge that they would never have to hang upon one.  But when Paul recites this hymn in this context, it would have been clear to every Philippian what he meant; “If Christ who had all the privileges of God gave himself to slavery and a cross, mustn’t you be willing to as well?” He is encountering the church at Philippi and, today, the church at Belle Chasse with that same Challenge Jesus made to his disciples in Luke 9:23 “If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me.”  His point is clear, citizens must be willing to become slaves if they are to put others above themselves.

TWO OBSERVATIONS OF 9-11

Very quickly, Paul goes on to tell us that the story of Christ’s slave’s death on a cross does not end in shame but in glory.  Allow me to make two quick observations of 9-11 and we will close.

First, this passage along with many others assures believers that sharing in the humility of the cross leads to sharing in the glory of Jesus’ resurrection.  I would simply point you to Romans 6:5 as an example of this, “For if we have been united with him in a death like his, we shall certainly be united with him in a resurrection like his.”  Thus, Paul ends with an encouragement that in giving up citizenship for slavery, we will ultimately share in the greatest event of all history, the resurrection.

Second, I do not want us to miss the model this hymn gives us.  Christ’s humility leads to Christ’s exaltation.  In a much lesser way, our humility—intentional humility for the sake of Christ—will also lead to Christ’s exaltation.  This is why Paul says in Philippians 1, “it is my eager expectation and hope that I will not be at all ashamed, but that with full courage now as always Christ will be honored in my body, whether by life or by death.”  

INVITATION

For these two reasons, I invite you today to affirm in your lives to live as Slaves rather than citizens.  I know this message is a hard one for us.  We, like the Philippians, hold tremendous advantage in our citizenship.  But in slavery to Christ there is so much more to be had.  Yes, the Word challenges us to leave our privileges and status, to cast our money, power, and our very lives to the side for the sake of others.  But, brothers and sisters, there is a resurrection which awaits and a Savior which will be glorified if we do so.  Let us cast aside our citizenship in this world which is rotting by the day and instead submit ourselves to be slaves of Christ and, finding all satisfaction in him, joining with him in the imperishable blessing of new life!            


[1] Fee, Gordon D.  Paul’s Letter to the Philippians.  From the New International Commentary on the New Testament.  Ed. Ned B. Stonehouse, F.F. Bruce, and Gordon D. Fee.  (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1995), 213. 

Sunday, September 18, 2011

Discipleship and the American Dream (Matthew 8:18-22)

I think I was nine years old whenever I realized that there were differences between economic classes. That is probably later than this realization comes for most and the fact that I realized it so late was likely because my family was firmly entrenched in the middle class. We were not rich, nor were we poor. Because of this I had much in common with my friend who was the son of the local bank president, as well as my friend who lived across the street from me in a trailer. When I was nine or ten I was playing with some of my friends who were from a wealthy family and I suddenly realized something; they had more toys than I did, lots more. Not only that, but the toys they had were nicer and were all brands that I had seen on television commercials, their house was huge, and their “play clothes” cost more than anything I owned.


My nine year old mind did not take long to catch up with the reality of economics. From that day forward I realized that there was a difference in economic class between my friend’s families and my own. Something inside of me said that if I was talented, driven, and industrious, I too could own excessive amounts of nice things. That day, I affirmed that I would be wealthy when I grew up.

I watched the local news with my Granny almost every night growing up, and in the endless stream of weather reports, school board scandals, and interest pieces, I learned about the American Dream. It seemed like a simple dream, but everyone spoke of it as if it was so grand. It went like this:

1. Get a good job.

2. Buy a nice house.

3. Get ahead financially.

4. Have a family upon whom you can bestow the abundance of your excess lifestyle.

I was happy to realize that something I had began to desire was part of being American. I was not just pursuing something I wanted, I was being a good citizen. For the next several years, I resolved to accomplish this dream, to be better off than my parents, and to live a life of comfort.
All this changed when I was fifteen. For six years I had been convinced that I had to make money, I had to own property, I had to be comfortable. Then God called to follow His will for my life, which in my case, I knew meant forsaking my dreams of wealth. The truth was that He had been calling me since I was saved two years before, but at fifteen I accepted the calling. My dreams of wealth were gone. I knew that the American Dream would be unobtainable for me if I followed God’s will for my life. Then like a dreamer waking from a long sleep I realized something: The American Dream is as poor a dream as ever was concocted. What kind of a dream is it that causes a nine year old boy to dream of retirement? The dream I now embraced was the proclamation of the gospel, following Christ at all cost. It was a daring adventure, a better story, a life of true value.

In Matthew 8:18-22 two would be disciples approach Jesus. The first says that if Jesus is going anywhere, then he will follow. But Jesus tells him that everything from the birds to the foxes have a place to sleep except for Jesus and those who follow him. The man then turns away and chooses not to follow Jesus across the sea of Galillee. Another would be disciple comes to Jesus saying that he will follow Him after he has buried his father. Jesus tells this man that this is not an excuse and he demands his allegiance immediately.
How many would be disciples have there been in the American church who have come to Jesus and said, “I will follow you so long as I can keep this American dream alive.”? How many more missionaries, pastors, teachers would be in the service of the kingdom were it not for such a hindrance? How many lawyers, doctors, factory workers, and civil servants would have been used by God to transform the lives of those who were around them if they had lived for the Kingdom of God rather than the American Dream? How many children would have been fed, how many youth sent to evangelistic events, how many homeless given shelter if the people of God had put all of their financial support to the Kingdom of God rather than having the nicest clothes, toys, and food?

The truth is that Jesus’ call to us is still the same. We must follow him at all cost. We must realize that “Our citizenship is in heaven and from it we await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, who will transform our lowly body to be like his glorious body, by the power that enables him even to subject all things to himself.” (Philippians 3:20-21) O people of God, let us cease dreaming dreams of a kingdom and a world to which we do not belong. Let us set our hearts, minds, and souls on Christ and follow him recklessly, boldly, till His Kingdom comes!

A brief disclaimer: There is nothing wrong with having money, or a nice house, or nice clothes, so long as these things do not stand in the way of your relationship with God. I do not mean this to be anti upper class, nor do I mean it to be anti-American. I only ask that we take seriously the biblical teaching that we must allow nothing to get in the way of following Christ. I do see many of my fellow brothers and sisters chasing after it and never living up to their potential in the Kingdom. Pastors are not immune from this either, it is often tempting to use ministry for personal gains. Such pastors are loathed by all members of society, however, we call them televangelists.